The Supreme Court on June 30, 2014, decided Burwell v Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc—a deeply divisive case. Holding that the federal government cannot lawfully mandate “closely held” for-profit corporations to provide contraceptive coverage, the Court split 5-4 along ideological lines.1 The Court thus entered a political quagmire at the intersection of religious freedom, women’s health, and corporate personhood.
Gostin LO. The ACA’s Contraceptive Mandate: Religious Freedom, Women’s Health, and Corporate Personhood. JAMA. 2014;312(8):785–786. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.9455
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: