Author Affiliations: Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia (Dr Berlin), and Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School and Technology Assessment Group, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass (Dr Colditz).
Synthesis of research findings has a long-standing
tradition in science. While synthesis is currently required in the US
food and drug regulatory process, formal meta-analysis may substitute
for a pivotal study or broaden the generalizability of drug efficacy
through a preplanned meta-analysis. Preplanned meta-analysis of
individual trials with deliberately introduced heterogeneity may
maximize the generalizability of results from randomized trials.
Combining observational data may help to support an alternative claim
or to quantify adverse events. In this setting, methods to address
potentially greater sources of bias are required. Overall,
meta-analysis adds evidence through the synthesis study findings and
permits examination of how treatment effects vary across of subgroups,
such as age and sex, and across study settings.
Berlin JA, Colditz GA. The Role of Meta-analysis in the Regulatory Process for Foods, Drugs, and Devices. JAMA. 1999;281(9):830–834. doi:10.1001/jama.281.9.830
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: