Context Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has become an option for couples
for whom termination of an affected pregnancy identified by traditional prenatal
diagnosis is unacceptable and is applicable to indications beyond those of
prenatal diagnosis, such as HLA matching to affected siblings to provide stem
cell transplantation.
Objective To describe preimplantation HLA typing, not involving identification
of a causative gene, for couples who had children with bone marrow disorders
at need for HLA-matched stem cell transplantation.
Design, Setting, and Participants HLA matching procedures conducted at a single site during 2002-2003
in an in vitro fertilization program for 9 couples with children affected
by acute lymphoid leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, or Diamond-Blackfan anemia
requiring HLA-matched stem cell transplantation. In 13 clinical cycles, DNA
in single blastomeres removed from 8-cell embryos following in vitro fertilization
was analyzed for HLA genes simultaneously with analysis for short tandem repeats
in the HLA region to select and transfer only those embryos that were HLA
matched to affected siblings.
Main Outcome Measures Results of HLA matching and pregnancy outcome.
Results As a result of testing a total of 199 embryos, 45 (23%) HLA-matched
embryos were selected, of which 28 were transferred in 12 clinical cycles,
resulting in 5 singleton pregnancies and birth of 5 HLA-matched healthy children.
Conclusion This is the first known experience of preimplantation HLA typing performed
without PGD for a causative gene, providing couples with a realistic option
of having HLA-matched offspring to serve as potential donors of stem cells
for their affected siblings.
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has become available as an alternative
to prenatal diagnosis in order to avoid the risk for pregnancy termination,
because PGD allows selection of unaffected embryos before a pregnancy is established.
Despite the need for ovarian stimulation and in vitro fertilization (IVF)
to be part of the procedure, PGD has become an acceptable method for avoiding
the birth of children with genetic disorders.1-3 Introduced
more than a decade ago, PGD has been applied in thousands of clinical cycles.4
At present, more than 100 different genetic conditions are indications
for PGD, including a few novel indications for which traditional prenatal
diagnosis has never been used.5-9 This
includes preimplantation HLA matching combined with PGD, not only to allow
couples to have an unaffected child, but also to select a potential donor
progeny for stem cell transplantation.8 The
approach has previously been applied to avoid the birth of a child with Fanconi
anemia (FA), which is a severe autosomal recessive disorder characterized
by inherited bone marrow failure requiring bone marrow or cord blood transplantation
from an HLA-matched sibling.8 This approach
resulted in the birth of an HLA-matched child free of FA whose cord blood
stem cells were transplanted to the affected sibling with FA, resulting in
a successful hematopoietic reconstitution. HLA matching would not be considered
appropriate for prenatal diagnosis because of the potential for termination
of pregnancy, which could not be justified for the reason of HLA incompatibility.
We describe the first clinical experience of preimplantation HLA matching
without PGD of a causative gene, demonstrating the feasibility of this novel
approach for stem cell transplantation in siblings with bone marrow failure.
The preimplantation testing procedures were conducted at the Reproductive
Genetics Institute (RGI), Chicago, Ill. The RGI was established in 1989 and
in 1994 was designated as a Pan American Health Organization/World Health
Organization Collaborating Center for Prevention of Genetic Disorders. The
study was approved by the RGI institutional review board, which is composed
of individuals who are independent of the RGI and which includes 2 obstetricians;
1 clinical geneticist physician; 1 internist; 1 anesthesiologist; 1 individual
with a master's degree in genetic counseling; 1 medical laboratory technologist;
2 individuals with doctorate degrees in public health and psychology, respectively;
3 individuals with master's degrees in public relations, industrial relations,
and nursing, respectively; and a church pastor. Of these, 6 are women. The
institutional review board approval covers protocol and consent forms, which
allows publication of the preimplantation genetic diagnosis data presented
herein. All sets of parents provided written informed consent for preimplantation
genetic diagnosis testing.
Thirteen IVF cycles (initial cycles did not have the desired outcome
for 4 couples) were initiated in 2002-2003 at the RGI for 9 couples from the
United States and England who had a child affected with acute lymphoid leukemia
or acute myeloid leukemia (11 cycles), or Diamond-Blackfan anemia (DBA) (2
cycles). These conditions require bone marrow transplantation and also have
been successfully treated by cord blood transplantation.10 Although
mutation testing also may be required in combination with HLA typing in DBA,
which can be caused by mutations in the gene encoding ribosomal protein S19
on chromosome 19 (19q13.2) or in another gene mapped to chromosome 8 (8p23.3-p22),
the majority of DBA cases are sporadic with no mutation detected,11 such as in both cases included in this study (testing
for the mutation was performed elsewhere). Each of the couples desired to
have another child—a desire separate from the hope of having another
child who could potentially serve as a donor of stem cells for the affected
sibling, for whom an acceptable HLA match had not been found. As there is
no institutional setting for identification of couples at need for preimplantation
HLA testing, all couples requested the test on their own, having learned of
the availability of the technique through their physicians or the Internet.
A standard protocol for IVF, which includes a psychological evaluation
performed by a psychologist at the RGI, was used in combination with a micromanipulation
procedure to remove single blastomeres from the cleaving embryos at day 3,
as described elsewhere.12 HLA genes from the
blastomeres were tested simultaneously with short tandem repeats in the HLA
region13 using a multiplex heminested polymerase
chain reaction (PCR) system12,14 involving
only closely linked polymorphic short tandem repeat markers located throughout
the HLA region, as shown in Figure 1 (HLA
genes: HLA-A1, -A2, -A3, -A24; -A32; HLA-C4, -C6; HLA-B27, -B18, -B35, -B51, -B57; HLA-DRB1*1, -DRB1*7, -DRB1*10,
and -DRB1*11. Short tandem repeats: D6S461; D6S276*;
D6S299; D6S464*; D6S105; D6S306*; D6S1624*; D6S258; D6S248*; MOG a,b,c,d;
RF; D6S265; D6S510; MIB; MICA; TNF a,b,c,d; 62; 82-1; 9N-2; D6S273*; DN; LH1;
DQ-CAR II; DQ-CAR; G51152; D6S2447; TAP1; Ring 3CA; D6S439*; D6S291; and D6S426). Figure 1 presents positions of closely linked
short tandem repeats throughout the HLA region ordered from telomere (top)
to centromere (bottom), allowing accurate HLA typing and identification of
possible recombinations, which may lead to misdiagnosis. An example of typing
for a marker is given in Figure 2.
For each family we selected heterozygous alleles and markers not shared by
the parents. Such markers provide the information about the origin of chromosome
6. A haplotype analysis for father, mother, and the affected child was performed
for each family prior to preimplantation HLA typing. This allowed avoidance
of misdiagnosis due to preferential amplification and allele drop out exceeding
10% in PCR analysis of single blastomeres,12,14 potential
recombination within the HLA region, and a possible aneuploidy or uniparental
disomy of chromosome 6, which may also affect the diagnostic accuracy of HLA
typing of the embryo. The multiplex nature of the first round of PCR analysis
required a similar annealing temperature for the outside primers. Thirty cycles
of PCR were performed with a denaturation step at 95°C for 20 seconds,
annealing at 62°C to 50°C for a minute, and elongation at 72°C
for 30 seconds. Twenty minutes of incubation at 96°C were performed before
starting cycling. After cycling, 10 minutes of elongation were performed at
72°C. Annealing temperature for the second round was programmed at 55°C
(details of the method have been published8,12).The
applied strategy provided a 100% HLA match, because the selected embryos had
the same paternal and maternal chromosome 6 as the affected siblings.
Two to 3 embryos determined to be HLA compatible with the affected sibling
were transferred; the other HLA-matched embryos were frozen for future availability.
As per the parents' written informed consent, some of the HLA-incompatible
embryos not chosen for freezing, and those with inconclusive results, underwent
PCR analysis of the whole embryo to corroborate the diagnosis based on blastomere
analysis. A follow-up assessment of the HLA match was conducted in the established
pregnancies using chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Since the leukemias
and the DBA in the affected siblings were sporadic and not associated with
chromosome 6, there was no reason for concern that the HLA-matched children
would be at risk for the same disease as the affected siblings.
A total of 199 embryos were tested for the 9 couples in 13 clinical
cycles performed by the time the data were submitted for publication (15 embryos
per cycle on the average), of which 45 (23%) were determined to be HLA matched
to the affected siblings. The HLA-matched embryos were available for transfer
in all but 1 cycle, for which there were no matched embryos. Overall, 28 HLA-matched
embryos were transferred in 12 clinical cycles, resulting in 5 singleton pregnancies
(42%) and births of 5 HLA-matched children. Of course, some couples require
multiple cycles of IVF to achieve pregnancy. These results suggest that testing
of approximately 10 embryos per cycle allows for selection of a sufficient
number of the HLA-matched embryos for transfer to achieve a pregnancy and
birth of an HLA-matched progeny.
The usefulness of detection of recombination within the HLA region is
demonstrated in Table 1, describing
the results of HLA typing of 1 of the cycles resulting in the birth of a child
HLA matched to a sibling with acute lymphoid leukemia. Of 10 embryos tested
simultaneously for 11 alleles within the relevant HLA region in this family,
recombination between the alleles for the D6S426 and Ring 3CA markers was
observed in embryos 4 and 9, and between D6S276* and D6S510 in embryo 7. Of
the remaining 7 embryos, 3 were fully matched (embryos 2, 6, and 8), while
the other 4 were HLA incompatible with the affected sibling, as seen from
the haplotypes of the mother, father, and affected child.
Figure 3 presents the results
of preimplantation HLA matching for DBA. One embryo with maternal recombination
(embryo 8) and another with both paternal and maternal recombination (embryo
16) (1 in the allele for the Ring 3CA marker and the other in the allele for
D6S426) were detected in testing of 16 embryos (examples of different HLA
typing results are shown). In addition, there was another embryo with trisomy
6 (embryo 5) with an extra maternal chromosome 6, making this and the other
2 above also unacceptable for transfer. However, 5 embryos appeared to be
HLA matched, of which 2 were transferred, resulting in the birth of an HLA-matched
child.
The relevance of aneuploidy testing for chromosome 6 is seen from the
results of HLA typing in another cycle, resulting in birth of an infant who
was HLA matched to the sibling with acute lymphoid leukemia (Figure 4). Two of 10 embryos tested in this case (examples of different
HLA typing results are shown) appeared to have only maternally derived chromosomes
6; 1 had only 1 maternal chromosome (embryo 1), and the other had 2 maternal
chromosomes, representing uniparental maternal disomy of chromosome 6 (embryo
2). In addition, recombination between D6S291 and class II HLA alleles was
evident in embryo 7, which was also unacceptable for transfer. Of the remaining
7 embryos, only 2 (only embryo 4 is shown) were HLA matched to the affected
sibling and transferred, resulting in the birth of an HLA-matched child.
Of only 7 embryos available for testing in another case of DBA, 4 were
HLA nonmatched, including the one with recombination between the alleles for
the TAP1 and Ring 3CA markers (embryo 8). The remaining 3 HLA-matched embryos
(embryos 2, 3, and 9) were transferred, resulting in a singleton pregnancy
and birth of an HLA-matched child (Table
2). In the remaining cycle performed for acute lymphoid leukemia
and resulting in the birth of an HLA-matched child, 6 HLA-matched embryos
were selected from 11 tested, with no evidence of recombination or aneuploidy.
The 5 children born as a result of preimplantation HLA matching (mean
age, approximately 1 year) are healthy and are comparable to more than 1000
children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis procedures, including
more than 400 children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis procedures
at our center. The mean birth weight percentile was 47% and the mean birth
length percentile was 57%. The 5 children born after preimplantation genetic
diagnosis procedures in the current study were confirmed to be HLA matched
(per HLA typing of blood) to their affected siblings. One sibling with DBA
received transplantation and is no longer red blood cell transfusion dependent,
whereas the others are in preparation for transplantation or are in remission.
The data herein show the potential feasibility of preimplantation HLA
matching for couples having a child affected with a bone marrow disorder,
who may wish to have another child as a potential HLA-matched donor of stem
cells for transplantation to the affected sibling. As our data show, HLA-matched
embryos were selected and transferred in all but 1 cycle, resulting in pregnancies
and birth of HLA-matched children in 42% of the transferred cycles, much higher
than the pregnancy rate observed in women undergoing IVF.15 Despite
the relatively high rate of preferential amplification and allele drop out
observed in PCR analysis of single blastomeres and potential for recombination
within the HLA region described in our material, and a high rate of mosaicism
for aneuploidies at the cleavage stage,16 the
introduced approach appeared to be highly accurate in the selection of HLA-matched
embryos for transfer. This approach involves a multiplex PCR analysis involving
testing for HLA alleles together with short tandem repeat markers within HLA
and flanking regions, allowing the avoidance of misdiagnosis due to allele
drop out, aneuploidy, or recombination of HLA alleles. Recombination in the
HLA region was observed in 4.3% of blastomeres tested, suggesting the existence
of a few areas in the HLA region that are prone to a higher recombination
rate, which should be detected in order to avoid the risk for misdiagnosis
(Verlinsky et al, unpublished data, September 2003). On the other hand, aneuploidy
of chromosome 6 was detected in 6.4% of blastomeres, including trisomy (2.2%)
and monosomy 6 (4.2%) (Verlinsky et al, unpublished data, September 2003).
As mentioned, preimplantation HLA matching has previously been used
together with PGD for FA to select and transfer unaffected embryos, avoiding
affected pregnancy and also producing a potential donor progeny for stem cell
transplantation for the affected sibling with FA.8 In
contrast, no testing for a causative gene was performed in the present series
of couples, the sole objective being to identify the HLA-matched embryos.
Although still highly controversial and even not allowed in some countries,
this appeared to be a reasonable option for couples, because only a limited
number of the embryos resulting from a hormonal hyperstimulation in IVF are
actually selected for transfer anyway. Therefore, instead of selecting embryos
for transfer based on morphologic criteria, those unaffected embryos representing
an HLA match are selected. There are important ethical issues involving the
selection of embryos with different normal parameters such as HLA type; however,
preimplantation HLA typing allows for the avoidance of the ethical dilemma
of therapeutic cloning.17,18 The
decision about preimplantation HLA typing is presently left with individuals
and clinicians, as it is still expensive (approximately $3000 on average for
preimplantation HLA typing alone [the cost of IVF can exceed $10 000
in the United States and is covered by insurance in only some states; HLA
testing is not covered]) and not obligatorily covered by health insurers.
Our results also demonstrate the prospect for the application of this
approach to other conditions requiring an HLA-compatible donor for stem cell
transplantation. This provides a realistic option for those couples who are
parents of an affected child, who desire to have another child, and who—as
a wholly separate issue—hope that the subsequent child might serve as
a donor of stem cells for the affected sibling. In addition to sporadic forms
of DBA, as well as leukemia, the method may potentially be applied to other
conditions; for example, the method might be used by parents who have unsuccessfully
sought an HLA-compatible donor for a child with other types of cancer. These
expanding indications make preimplantation testing a complement to traditional
prenatal diagnosis, allowing parents to avoid inherited conditions and pregnancy
termination. At the same time, the evidence suggests that it may now be possible
for a pregnancy to have genetic characteristics that may be beneficial for
affected individuals in the family.
1.International Working Group on Preimplantation Genetics. 2001 Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis—Experience of Three Thousand
Clinical Cycles. Report of the 11th Annual Meeting International Working Group
on Preimplantation Genetics, in conjunction with the 10th International Congress
of Human Genetics; May 15-19, 2001; Vienna, Austria.
Reprod BioMed Online.2001;3:49-53.Google Scholar 2.Geraedts J, Handyside A, Harper J.
et al. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology Preimplantation
Genetic Diagnosis Consortium Steering Committee. ESHRE preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) consortium: data collection
II (May 2000).
Hum Reprod.2000;15:2673-2683.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11098044&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 3.Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Current features of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Reprod Biomed Online.2002;5:296-309.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12470529&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 4.Verlinsky Y, Cohen J, Munne S.
et al. Over a decade of preimplantation genetic diagnosis experience—a
multicenter report.
Fertil Steril.In press.Google Scholar 5.Rechitsky S, Verlinsky O, Chistokhina A.
et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for cancer predisposition.
Reprod Biomed Online.2002;5:148-155.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12419039&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 6.Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Verlinsky O.
et al. Preimplantation diagnosis for early onset Alzheimer disease caused
by V717L mutation.
JAMA.2002;287:1018-1021.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11866650&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 7.Abou-Sleiman PM, Apessos A, Harper JC, Serhal P, Delhanty JD. Pregnancy following preimplantation genetic diagnosis for Crouson syndrome.
Mol Hum Reprod.2002;8:304-309.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11870239&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 8.Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Schoolcraft W, Strom C, Kuliev A. Preimplantation diagnosis for Fanconi anemia combined with HLA matching.
JAMA.2001;285:3130-3133.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11427142&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 9.Verlinsky Y, Rechitsky S, Verlinsky O.
et al. Preimplantation diagnosis for sonic hedgehog mutation causing familial
holoprosencephaly.
N Engl J Med.2003;348:1449-1454.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12686701&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 10. Cord blood banking.
Bull World Health Organ.1998;76:313-314.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9744253&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 11.Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM). Diamond-Blackfan anemia, autosomal dominant.
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM 105650, OMIM 205900). Available
at: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Omim. Accessed April 8, 2004.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=Omim.
Accessed April 8, 2004.
12.Verlinsky Y, Kuliev A. Atlas of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. London, England: Parthenon Publishing Group; 2000.
13.Foissac A, Salhi M, Cambon-Thomsen A. Microsatellites in the HLA region: 1999 update.
Tissue Antigens.2000;55:477-509.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10902606&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 14.Rechitsky S, Strom C, Verlinsky O.
et al. Accuracy of preimplantation diagnosis of single-gene disorders by polar
body analysis of oocytes.
J Assist Reprod Genet.1999;16:192-198.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10224562&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 15. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1997 results
generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for
Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry.
Fertil Steril.2000;74:641-654.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11020500&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 16.Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical and structural chromosome
abnormalities.
Reprod BioMed Online.2002;4:183-196.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12470583&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 17.Damewood MD. Ethical implications of a new application of preimplantation diagnosis.
JAMA.2001;285:3143-3144.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11427146&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar 18.Edwards RG. Ethics of preimplantation diagnosis: recordings from the Fourth International
Symposium on Preimplantation Genetics.
Reprod BioMed Online.2003;6:170-180.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&Dopt=r&uid=entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12675996&dopt=Abstract
Google Scholar