Author Affiliation: Georgetown University Law
Center, Washington, DC.
Federal and state courts have reached a broad consensus on matters of
death and dying since the seminal cases of Karen Ann Quinlan in 19761 and Nancy Cruzan in 1990.2 So
too has there been substantial consensus in the bioethics literature.3 Courts and scholars have affirmed a person’s
right to refuse life-sustaining treatment and concluded that this right remains
intact even if the person is no longer able to speak for herself.4 Near relatives and the courts should adopt the same
course of action the person would have chosen if competent.5
Gostin LO. Ethics, the Constitution, and the Dying Process: The Case of Theresa Marie Schiavo. JAMA. 2005;293(19):2403–2407. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.19.2403
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: