In news and public opinion, scientists are often considered a breed apart, arrogant, eccentric, bizarre, or godlike. Why are such depictions so compelling to a general audience? Conversely, why is the idea of the zany, absent-minded, professorial scientist so entrenched? Why does the public seem so suspicious of rapidly emerging science and technology? Taking a narrow focus through the lens of film history, Christopher Frayling examines one aspect of this complex phenomenon, reaching the unsurprising conclusion that distorted cinematic images of scientists may impede a realistic appreciation of the actual motivations and practices of scientific and technical professionals.
Yom SS. Mad, Bad and Dangerous? The Scientist and the Cinema. JAMA. 2007;297(5):533–537. doi:10.1001/jama.297.5.533
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.