Letters Section Editor: Robert M. Golub, MD, Senior Editor.
To the Editor: In their Rational Clinical Examination article, Drs Tibbles and Edlow1 reviewed the accuracy of history and physical examination findings for the diagnosis of erythema migrans. There are 2 issues that are important to consider.
First, Table 2 states that erythema migrans is accompanied by mild pain or itch. However, in most cases erythema migrans is entirely asymptomatic.2 Pruritus, when present, may be due to a hypersensitivity reaction to the tick bite, irrespective of the presence of borrelial pathogens.3 This pruritus lasts about a week, resolving around the time that most cases of erythema migrans begin to appear.2 Moreover, a study conducted in Rhode Island suggests that patients with significant pruritus after a tick bite are less likely to develop Lyme disease than those who experience mild or no itch.3 An explanation offered is that individuals with prominent itch at the bite site are more likely to be aware of the affected area, leading to early removal of the tick, thus preventing transmission of the pathogen. Also, the presence of an itchy hypersensitivity response indicates prior exposure to tick bites. Individuals with multiple previous tick bites may have acquired a protective immune response (perhaps to tick salivary antigens) that thwarts disease transmission.3
Norton SA. Diagnosis of Erythema Migrans. JAMA. 2007;298(10):1159–1160. doi:10.1001/jama.298.10.1159-b
* * SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE * *
The JAMA Network Sites will be conducting routine maintenance from 10/20/2017 through 10/21/2017. During this window access to content and authentication may be intermittently available. The JAMA Store will be completely unavailable during the maintenance window.