[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.173.48.53. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 13, 1913

Current Comment

JAMA. 1913;61(24):2163-2164. doi:10.1001/jama.1913.04350250049019
Abstract

OZONE TO HIDE ODORS  "We have long been of the opinion," says the San Francisco Argonaut, "that whatever is unpleasant is bad for us, and we have endeavored in our humble and unscientific way to rule our lives accordingly. That is why we object to cold mutton and to being contradicted. They are bad for us—we felt it was so without knowing the reason." This was apropos of the contention of Dr. Hill of London that ozone is of value, not because it kills germs, but because it removes odors and the like that are injurious because they are unpleasant. Here we have an apparent conflict between esthetics and health. The instinctive shrinking from bad odors is almost a natural protective mechanism. At first thought there comes to mind only one really edible substance possessed of a bad odor, and it has fallen into some disrepute. The man who first

×