The attention of urologists and surgeons is constantly being called to the brilliant reports on the mortality record of perineal surgery, on both the prostate and seminal vesicles. My interest in perineal prostatectomy was stimulated by a series of seminal vesicle operations which always healed kindly and which also gave me wider experience in perineal anatomy.
For several years I endeavored to select my cases as best suited for the perineal or the suprapubic route, but for the last two and a half years I have adopted the perineal route as a routine. Recent reports by Young, Hinman, Geraghty, Crowell and Thompson on the en masse enucleation through the perineum prompted me to try their modifications in a small series of cases. The results were somewhat unsatisfactory, as to both healing and function. Having lost fear of damaging the anterior part of the prostatic urethra by en masse enucleations about
DILLON JR. PERINEAL PROSTATECTOMY BY A MODIFIED TECHNIC. JAMA. 1924;82(4):287–291. doi:10.1001/jama.1924.02650300033008
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: