This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:
—The letter of Dr. Whipple (The Journal, January 30) needs a seconder, because the subject is of great importance. The assertion of Williamson and Ets (Arch. Int. Med.36:333 [Sept.] 1925) that inorganic iron is of no value in anemia is not true. From a clinical standpoint, bleeding an animal does not cause "anemia." Anemia is a distinct pathologic condition, primary or secondary. For laboratory experimenters to bleed animals and then to administer inorganic iron, and to state that it is of no benefit, but that food irons are of benefit, and then to draw the conclusion that inorganic iron is useless in the anemias of human beings, and broadcast the belief, is inexcusable. Such an assertion will certainly be used as an advertisement for the various organic irons on the market. Animals that have been bled, or human beings suffering from hemorrhage, do not have
Osborne OT. IRON IN ANEMIA. JAMA. 1926;86(8):571. doi:10.1001/jama.1926.02670340049028
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: