[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.191.0. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
December 2, 1933

AMEBIC DYSENTERY

Author Affiliations

San Francisco

JAMA. 1933;101(23):1819-1820. doi:10.1001/jama.1933.02740480051026

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —It is not without grim humor that California medical men join their colleagues of the Southern states in observing the dramatization by Chicago health authorities of an outbreak of amebiasis recently recognized in that city. The 1927 Chicago survey (Kaplan, Bertha; Williamson, C. D., and Geiger, J. C.: Amebic Dysentery in Chicago, The Journal, March 26, 1927, p. 977) was of practical significance but the recommendations of this initial report obviously were not followed up. However, the present health authorities are to be congratulated on continuing this work and realizing its importance. Generally considered a "tropical disease," physicians in most of the United States have consistently refused to admit its potential menace as revealed by the extraordinarily high incidence of "carriers" without obvious symptoms (who have tissue damage, nevertheless) along with active cases found on systematic surveys of average populations in California and the South (Kofoid, A.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×