[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.52.4. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Editorial
February 9, 2016

Improving Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing: Another Nudge in the Right Direction

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Infectious Diseases, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  • 2Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 

Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA. 2016;315(6):558-559. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.0430

More than 250 million outpatient antibiotic prescriptions are written in the US each year,1 most of which are for acute respiratory tract infections. A large proportion of these prescriptions are unnecessary.2

Antibiotic overuse leads to unnecessary adverse drug effects and antimicrobial-resistant infections, which harm patients. To address this threat, professional organizations and regulatory agencies have called for acute care hospitals to establish antimicrobial stewardship programs, which are quality improvement and patient safety initiatives to optimize antimicrobial use.3 The vast majority of antibiotic use, however, occurs in the outpatient setting, mostly in internal medicine, family practice, pediatric, and dental offices,1 where there is virtually no formal antimicrobial stewardship. In addition, although the most resistant organisms usually involve infections among hospitalized patients, difficult-to-treat infections such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and extended-spectrum beta lactamase–producing Enterobacteriaciae are now commonly isolated from community-onset infections. Thus, adapting the principles of antimicrobial stewardship to the ambulatory setting should be prioritized.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    The Antibacterials
    Mark Jeffries, M.D. | Retired
    I think much of the problem of "antibiotic" prescription for non-bacterial infections could be solved by reformulating the concept of "antibiotic," which should be a group concept encompassing the "antibacterials," the "antivirals," the "antifungals," etc. Patients should be taught that the penicillins, cephalosporins, etc. are "antibacterials." A patient could readily understand that one can't treat a viral infection with an antibacterial. (And, one can treat a viral infection with an antiviral antibiotic if one is available that targets the infection.)
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    ×