[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
June 14, 1941


JAMA. 1941;116(24):2713. doi:10.1001/jama.1941.02820240073023

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  An explanation for the efficacy of sulfapyridine and sulfathiazole which I have not seen in print is suggested by an examination of their structural formulas:Now, sulfapyridine differs from the parent sulfanilamide by having a pyridine nucleus attached to the amido group. This pyridine nucleus is present in the quinoline alkaloids, such as quinine, and also in the synthetic ethyl hydrocupreine hydrochloride. These are toxic to pneumococci, and the effectiveness of sulfapyridine may possibly be due in some measure to the added pyridine nucleus.If sulfur is substituted for an ethylene linkage in a cyclic compound, the properties are not changed much. Thus, thiophene To the Editor:— and benzene To the Editor:— have properties so close that it is very difficult to separate them. In the same fashion, thiazole To the Editor:— differs little from pyridine To the Editor:— in chemical and physical properties.Thus, one would expect sulfathiazole to have about the same chemical properties, and therefore pharmacologic action,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview