This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:
—In my article "Interesting Aspects of a Case of Congenitally Absent Gallbladder" (The Journal, August 27) I commented on a similar case reported by Dr. Lintz.My comment was: "The exceptional condition found by Dr. Lintz is, in great likelihood, to be explained on the same principle as obtains in the recovery of B bile in long past cholecystectomized patients, wherein the biliary ducts often undergo gradual dilatation."In a letter which appeared in The Journal, September 24, Dr. Lintz rejects my explanation, stating that I missed the crux of the situation, because the surgeon, as I had stated in my article, had very carefully examined for dilatation of the biliary ducts, but no dilatation of the ducts could be found. The B bile could therefore not have come from dilated ducts.I believe that I did not make my explanation entirely clear. The dilatation I referred
Golob M. CONGENITALLY ABSENT GALLBLADDER. JAMA. 1927;89(21):1802. doi:10.1001/jama.1927.02690210068031
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: