[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Special Communication
July 5, 2016

Attitudes and Practices of Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
  • 2Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research and Cancer Center Amsterdam, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • 3End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussels (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
 

Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA. 2016;316(1):79-90. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.8499
Abstract

Importance  The increasing legalization of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide worldwide makes it important to understand related attitudes and practices.

Objective  To review the legal status of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide and the available data on attitudes and practices.

Evidence Review  Polling data and published surveys of the public and physicians, official state and country databases, interview studies with physicians, and death certificate studies (the Netherlands and Belgium) were reviewed for the period 1947 to 2016.

Findings  Currently, euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide can be legally practiced in the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Colombia, and Canada (Quebec since 2014, nationally as of June 2016). Physician-assisted suicide, excluding euthanasia, is legal in 5 US states (Oregon, Washington, Montana, Vermont, and California) and Switzerland. Public support for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States has plateaued since the 1990s (range, 47%-69%). In Western Europe, an increasing and strong public support for euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide has been reported; in Central and Eastern Europe, support is decreasing. In the United States, less than 20% of physicians report having received requests for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide, and 5% or less have complied. In Oregon and Washington state, less than 1% of licensed physicians write prescriptions for physician-assisted suicide per year. In the Netherlands and Belgium, about half or more of physicians reported ever having received a request; 60% of Dutch physicians have ever granted such requests. Between 0.3% to 4.6% of all deaths are reported as euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide in jurisdictions where they are legal. The frequency of these deaths increased after legalization. More than 70% of cases involved patients with cancer. Typical patients are older, white, and well-educated. Pain is mostly not reported as the primary motivation. A large portion of patients receiving physician-assisted suicide in Oregon and Washington reported being enrolled in hospice or palliative care, as did patients in Belgium. In no jurisdiction was there evidence that vulnerable patients have been receiving euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide at rates higher than those in the general population.

Conclusions and Relevance  Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are increasingly being legalized, remain relatively rare, and primarily involve patients with cancer. Existing data do not indicate widespread abuse of these practices.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    Euthanasia and the Hippocratic Oath
    William W. Resinger, MD | Retired radiologist in Palmer and Nome, Alaska since 1984

    When I took the Hippocratic oath in 1969, it was the "classical version", as described in the PBS Special of 2001. I forswore euthanasia (and abortion) along with generations of physicians 2500 years before me. In only a few decades the general population and medical leaders have rushed down a "slippery slope" away from the sanctity of human life, espoused by even pagan physicians at the dawn of Western Civilization. I pray that my colleagues of all ages will soberly consider where the path down this dark tunnel will lead.


    At one time proponents of abortion said that they desired
    the procedure to be "rare" and "safe." At one time only Christians saved unwanted babies thrown into the streets by the Romans. At one time hospitals were established and were named for the Christian Denominations that founded them. At one time the oldest hospital in America had a Scripture, Matthew 25:40, chiseled into a marble panel on the wall. That Scripture, placed on the wall 200 years before I saw it, inspired me in my third year to complete my medical training.

    As physicians we must seek out the highest moral ground in these matters of life and death. Maybe the "classical version" of the Hippocratic Oath is not outmoded. Dare I say, maybe even a little Scripture may apply?
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    ×