Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.
Candida species are the most common cause of invasive fungal infections, accounting for 70% to 90% of hospital cases.1,2 Although the overall US incidence of candidemia is low among nonneutropenic, critically ill adults (approximately 2/1000 intensive care unit [ICU] admissions), candidemia results in a longer length of stay (≤1 month), costs in excess of $40 000 per case, and a 30-day mortality greater than 50%.1-3 Moreover, mortality from invasive fungal infection has been increasing over the past decade, suggesting that advances in the management for invasive fungal infection have lagged behind those for bacterial septic shock.4 In light of the high mortality associated with invasive fungal infection, particularly among critically ill patients, a number of guidelines have focused on empirical treatment with antifungal echinocandins and surveillance for Candida either through culture or diagnostic biomarkers.5,6 Accordingly, the use of echinocandins has increased from 4.6% to 48.5% in some settings.7 Yet little was previously known about mortality benefits from prophylactic antifungal therapy.
Siddharthan T, Karakousis PC, Checkley W. Empirical Antifungal Therapy in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: Another Case of Less Is More in the ICU. JAMA. 2016;316(15):1549–1550. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.13801
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: