[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
March 9, 1935

Foreign Letters

JAMA. 1935;104(10):845-849. doi:10.1001/jama.1935.02760100055020

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

LONDON 

(From Our Regular Correspondent)  Feb. 9, 1935.

Psychology and Religion  The presidential address of Dr. David Forsyth to the Section of Psychiatry of the Royal Society of Medicine, on Psychology and Religion, published in the Times, provoked a vehement reaction among religious persons. He maintained that the new spirit of toleration between science and religion, which led some to believe that there was no inherent conflict between the two, was not supported by modern psychology, which showed their incompatibility more than ever. Psychoanalytic research traced many religious ideas back to unexpected sources in childhood. The "voice of conscience" proved to be the voice of the father as heard years ago in childhood. Similarly, the attributes attached to God by adults were those which had been experienced in the father. The sense of sin and guilt, which showed itself in children about the age of 7, always was a conflict

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×