[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
June 6, 1931

PARIS

JAMA. 1931;96(23):1964-1965. doi:10.1001/jama.1931.02720490044021

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

Discussion on the Obligation to Use Antitetanic Serum  The imposition of a penalty on a physician for his alleged culpability, in the death of a man injured in a factory, for not giving antitetanic serum immediately after the injury, has caused considerable stir in the profession. Any wound, however slight, may give rise to tetanus, and yet injections of antitetanic serum are not invariably given after minimal injuries. All physicians are thus exposed every day to a similar sentence. An interesting discussion developed recently at a meeting of the Academy of Medicine, following the report of the committee appointed by the academy to study the question. The chairman of the committee was Dr. Roux, and Professor Gosset was the spokesman. The committee did not assume to lay down inviolable rules for the physicians. Nevertheless, it felt that the expression of an opinion was not out of place. The preventive injection

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×