This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:
—It is indeed instructive to have an article such as the one by Dr. Saltzstein on "The Average Treatment of Cancer" in The Journal (August 18, p. 465). After all, it is not so much what can be done and is done in the leading institutions for the cancer patient, but what is done by the average man for the average patient the country over, that counts. Viewed from this standpoint the outlook is rather gloomy but not hopeless.The cancer situation is going through the same phases as the tuberculosis problem did years ago. The public must be educated. Yes; but the profession must also have some of its age-old ideas, that have been handed down for years, revamped. The tuberculosis question has really resolved itself into a question of reeducation of the patient under the control and guidance of a physician trained and interested in
Meland ON. "THE AVERAGE TREATMENT OF CANCER". JAMA. 1928;91(15):1128. doi:10.1001/jama.1928.02700150054029
* * SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE * *
The JAMA Network Sites will be conducting routine maintenance from 10/20/2017 through 10/21/2017. During this window access to content and authentication may be intermittently available. The JAMA Store will be completely unavailable during the maintenance window.