[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
October 20, 1928

TUBERCULAR VERSUS TUBERCULOUS

Author Affiliations

Philadelphia.

JAMA. 1928;91(16):1211. doi:10.1001/jama.1928.02700160063028

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —I have just consulted that wonderful treasure house the Oxford Dictionary, as to the use of "tubercular" and "tuberculous."The dictionary gives, in brief, under "Tubercular," (Nat. Hist.) "of the nature or form of a tubercle."(Path.) "Of, pertaining to, caused or characterized by, or affected with tubercles," for example, nodular or tubercular leprosy, tubercular syphilis, neither of these being caused by the tubercle bacillus.Under "Tuberculous" the dictionary says, "Since 1882 almost always used specifically in reference to the Tubercle Bacillus or to Tuberculosis and thus technically distinguished from Tubercular in the general sense."We ought to follow the definition of the Oxford Dictionary, which is, of course, for all English-speaking people, the highest authority.

Comment.  —For many years the publications of the American Medical Association Press have followed the usage here set forth.—Editor.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×