This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
This is an exceptionally valuable contribution to the literature of health education. It makes a dual contribution. First it gives a much needed evaluation of dental health literature and clarifies many inaccuracies. Second, it furnishes a pattern for similar evaluation of health education literature in other fields which might well be undertaken by persons as well qualified, for example, in nutrition, communicable disease control and personal hygiene as are the authors of this evaluation in dentistry.
Without going into detail as to the numerous fallacies, controversial statements, half truths and downright errors occurring in dental literature issued not by advertisers, quacks or promoters but by reputable health education groups, it is sufficient to point out here that the authors based their survey on a large number of sources, of which they list seventy-six state health department bulletins, twenty-four publications of the American Dental Association and five miscellaneous publications, including one
An Evaluation of Dental Health Literature. JAMA. 1943;122(1):67. doi:10.1001/jama.1943.02840180069031
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: