In Reply In highlighting the potential misuse of practice guidelines in litigation, Mr Kels and Dr Kels draw attention to one of the many unintended consequences of intermediate-grade recommendations; that is, that the authority of a professional society’s imprimatur and the appearance of quantitation inherent in an alphanumeric rating system may convey the impression of an action that is thoroughly evidence-based and ought to be performed, despite any number of layers of equivocation that might be deployed as a hedge against that impression.
Klasco RS, Glinert LH. Legal Ramifications of Ambiguous Clinical Guidelines—Reply. JAMA. 2017;317(19):2020–2021. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.4505
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: