In 1928 the late Dr. Joseph Jastrow1 declared that the freudian movement was rejected by the medical profession as unorthodox. "Its entire history is unfortunate," he said. "It was born in the clinic—an unfortunate birthplace for any doctrine with so wide and so personal an application; it was reared in distracting controversy; it traveled on the visé of psychoanalysis—a procedure as open to abuse as any narrow cult, and more so." A vast literature on freudianism and the psychoanalytic method, some of it bitterly derogatory, has appeared. Now, some thirty-seven years since the freudian theory was first brought to the United States by an article published by Boris Sidis in the Journal of Abnormal Psychology, an unprejudiced opinion of freudianism as a theory and psychoanalysis as an instrument is still difficult to secure.
The aim of psychoanalysis as Freud conceived it "was not to tell people unpleasant truths about
PSYCHOANALYSIS AND THE SCIENTIFIC METHOD. JAMA. 1943;122(12):811–812. doi:10.1001/jama.1943.02840290031011
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: