Nutrition research is among the most contentious fields of science. Although the totality of an individual’s diet has important effects on health, most nutrients and foods individually have ambiguously tiny (or nonexistent) effects.1 Substantial reliance on observational data for which causal inference is notoriously difficult also limits the clarifying ability of nutrition science. When the data are not clear, opinions and conflicts of interest both financial and nonfinancial may influence research articles, editorials, guidelines, and laws.2 Therefore, disclosure policies are an important safeguard to help identify potential bias. In this Viewpoint, we contend that current norms for disclosure in nutrition science are inadequate and propose that greater transparency is needed, including a broader definition of what constitutes disclosure-worthy information.
Ioannidis JPA, Trepanowski JF. Disclosures in Nutrition Research: Why It Is Different. JAMA. 2018;319(6):547–548. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.18571
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: