To the Editor Drs Leichsenring and Steinert argued that cognitive behavioral therapies (CBTs) should not be the gold standard treatment for mental disorders.1 They acknowledged that CBTs have been more widely studied than other forms of therapy but suggested that other treatments should be considered equivalent to CBTs unless evidence emerges to suggest otherwise. In doing so, they shifted the burden of evidence about the efficacy of other treatments away from those treatments and onto the evidence base for CBTs. In other areas of medicine, treatments with a broader positive evidence base are not considered equal to less widely studied treatments.
Lorenzo-Luaces L. The Evidence for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. JAMA. 2018;319(8):831–832. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.20826
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: