[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 529
Citations 0
Comment & Response
March 6, 2018

Lung Recruitment and Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Research Institute Hospital do Coração, São Paulo, Brazil
  • 2Pulmonary Division, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
JAMA. 2018;319(9):934-935. doi:10.1001/jama.2017.21864

In Reply Dr McKown and colleagues suggest that the method used to personalize PEEP might be one explanation for the higher mortality in the recruitment maneuver and PEEP titration group. When multiple PEEP levels had similar compliance, we set the PEEP at 2 cm above the highest of these levels based on observations from a previous case series.1 Mean PEEP levels used in the experimental group were similar to other high-PEEP trials. We also used a tidal volume of 5 mL/kg predicted body weight during PEEP titration, although tidal volume was set at 6 mL/kg during maintenance ventilation (or lower if plateau pressure >30 cm H2O). We acknowledge that using the same tidal volume both during PEEP titration and maintenance ventilation would have been a better choice, although the small differences between tidal volume during PEEP titration and maintenance ventilation were unlikely to substantially change the level of optimal PEEP.