Effect of Intravesical Instillation of Gemcitabine vs Saline Immediately Following Resection of Suspected Low-Grade Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer on Tumor Recurrence: SWOG S0337 Randomized Clinical Trial | Oncology | JAMA | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.204.186.91. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Siegel  RL, Miller  KD, Jemal  A.  Cancer statistics, 2017.  CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7-30.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Messing  EM, Madeb  R, Young  T,  et al.  Long-term outcome of hematuria home screening for bladder cancer in men.  Cancer. 2006;107(9):2173-2179.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Botteman  MF, Pashos  CL, Redaelli  A, Laskin  B, Hauser  R.  The health economics of bladder cancer: a comprehensive review of the published literature.  Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(18):1315-1330.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Babjuk  M, Böhle  A, Burger  M,  et al.  EAU guidelines on non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: update 2016.  Eur Urol. 2017;71(3):447-461.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Chang  SS, Boorjian  SA, Chou  R,  et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline.  J Urol. 2016;196(4):1021-1029.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Tolley  DA, Parmar  MK, Grigor  KM,  et al.  The effect of intravesical mitomycin C on recurrence of newly diagnosed superficial bladder cancer: a further report with 7 years of follow up.  J Urol. 1996;155(4):1233-1238.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Solsona  E, Iborra  I, Ricós  JV, Monrós  JL, Casanova  J, Dumont  R.  Effectiveness of a single immediate mitomycin C instillation in patients with low risk superficial bladder cancer: short and long-term followup.  J Urol. 1999;161(4):1120-1123.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Oosterlinck  W, Kurth  KH, Schröder  F, Bultinck  J, Hammond  B, Sylvester  R.  A prospective European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Genitourinary Group randomized trial comparing transurethral resection followed by a single intravesical instillation of epirubicin or water in single stage Ta, T1 papillary carcinoma of the bladder.  J Urol. 1993;149(4):749-752.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Sylvester  R, Oosterlinck  W, Holmang  S,  et al.  Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing a single immediate instillation of chemotherapy after transurethral resection with transurethral resection alone in patients with stage pTa-pT1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: which patients benefit from the instillation?  Eur Urol. 2016;69(2):231-244. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Cookson  MS, Chang  SS, Oefelein  MG, Gallagher  JR, Schwartz  B, Heap  K.  National practice patterns for immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy in nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.  J Urol. 2012;187(5):1571-1576.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
von der Maase  H.  Current and future perspectives in advanced bladder cancer: is there a new standard?  Semin Oncol. 2002;29(1)(suppl 3):3-14.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
von der Maase  H, Hansen  SW, Roberts  JT,  et al.  Gemcitabine and cisplatin versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in advanced or metastatic bladder cancer: results of a large, randomized, multinational, multicenter, phase III study.  J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(17):3068-3077.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Scosyrev  E, Messing  EM, van Wijngaarden  E,  et al.  Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin chemotherapy for locally advanced urothelial cancer of the bladder.  Cancer. 2012;118(1):72-81.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Addeo  R, Caraglia  M, Bellini  S,  et al.  Randomized phase III trial on gemcitabine versus mytomicin in recurrent superficial bladder cancer: evaluation of efficacy and tolerance.  J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(4):543-548.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Mostofi  FK, Sobin  LH, Torloni  H,  et al.  Histological Typing of Urinary Bladder Tumours. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1973.
16.
Burnand  KG, Boyd  PJ, Mayo  ME, Shuttleworth  KE, Lloyd-Davies  RW.  Single dose intravesical thiotepa as an adjuvant to cystodiathermy in the treatment of transitional cell bladder carcinoma.  Br J Urol. 1976;48(1):55-59.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Cina  SJ, Epstein  JI, Endrizzi  JM, Harmon  WJ, Seay  TM, Schoenberg  MP.  Correlation of cystoscopic impression with histologic diagnosis of biopsy specimens of the bladder.  Hum Pathol. 2001;32(6):630-637.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Filson  CP, Montgomery  JS, Dailey  SM,  et al.  Complications associated with single-dose, perioperative mitomycin-C for patients undergoing bladder tumor resection.  Urol Oncol. 2014;32(1):40.e1-40.e8. PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Messing  E, Kim  KM, Sharkey  F,  et al.  Randomized prospective phase III trial of difluoromethylornithine vs placebo in preventing recurrence of completely resected low risk superficial bladder cancer.  J Urol. 2006;176(2):500-504.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Oken  MM, Creech  RH, Tormey  DC,  et al.  Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.  Am J Clin Oncol. 1982;5(6):649-655.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 (CTCAE). August 9, 2006. https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocoldevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcaev3.pdf. Accessed April 13, 2018.
22.
Scosyrev  E, Golijanin  D, Wu  G, Messing  E.  The burden of bladder cancer in men and women: analysis of the years of life lost.  BJU Int. 2012;109(1):57-62.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Madeb  R, Golijanin  D, Noyes  K,  et al.  Treatment of nonmuscle invading bladder cancer: do physicians in the United States practice evidence based medicine? the use and economic implications of intravesical chemotherapy after transurethral resection of bladder tumors.  Cancer. 2009;115(12):2660-2670.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Barocas  DA, Liu  A, Burks  FN,  et al.  Practice based collaboration to improve the use of immediate intravesical therapy after resection of nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer.  J Urol. 2013;190(6):2011-2016.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Davies  BJ, Hwang  TJ, Kesselheim  AS.  Ensuring access to injectable generic drugs—the case of intravesical BCG for bladder cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2017;376(15):1401-1403.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Böhle  A, Leyh  H, Frei  C,  et al; S274 Study Group.  Single postoperative instillation of gemcitabine in patients with non-muscle-invasive transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III multicentre study.  Eur Urol. 2009;56(3):495-503.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Whelan  P, Griffiths  G, Stower  M,  et al.  Preliminary results of a MRC randomized controlled trial of post-operative irrigation of superficial bladder cancer.  Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2001;20:708.Google Scholar
28.
Heinemann  V, Hertel  LW, Grindey  GB, Plunkett  W.  Comparison of the cellular pharmacokinetics and toxicity of 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine and 1-β-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine.  Cancer Res. 1988;48(14):4024-4031.PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
See  WA, Rohlf  DP, Crist  SA.  In vitro particulate adherence to fibronectin: correlation with in vivo particulate adherence to sites of bladder injury.  J Urol. 1992;147(5):1416-1423.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Grossman  HB, Stenzl  A, Fradet  Y,  et al.  Long-term decrease in bladder cancer recurrence with hexaminolevulinate enabled fluorescence cystoscopy.  J Urol. 2012;188(1):58-62.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Rink  M, Babjuk  M, Catto  JW,  et al.  Hexyl aminolevulinate-guided fluorescence cystoscopy in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a critical review of the current literature.  Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):624-638.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Naito  S, Algaba  F, Babjuk  M,  et al; CROES Narrow Band Imaging Global Study Group.  The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) multicentre randomised trial of narrow band imaging-assisted transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) versus conventional white light imaging-assisted TURBT in primary non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients: trial protocol and 1-year results.  Eur Urol. 2016;70(3):506-515.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Xiong  Y, Li  J, Ma  S,  et al.  A meta-analysis of narrow band imaging for the diagnosis and therapeutic outcome of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.  PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0170819.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Montironi  R, Lopez-Beltran  A, Mazzucchelli  R, Bostwick  DG.  Classification and grading of the non-invasive urothelial neoplasms: recent advances and controversies.  J Clin Pathol. 2003;56(2):91-95.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Böhle  A, Jocham  D, Bock  PR.  Intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin versus mitomycin C for superficial bladder cancer: a formal meta-analysis of comparative studies on recurrence and toxicity.  J Urol. 2003;169(1):90-95.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Cai  T, Nesi  G, Tinacci  G,  et al.  Can early single dose instillation of epirubicin improve bacillus Calmette-Guérin efficacy in patients with nonmuscle invasive high risk bladder cancer? results from a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled study.  J Urol. 2008;180(1):110-115.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 2018 ASP Drug Pricing Files. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Part-B-Drugs/McrPartBDrugAvgSalesPrice/2018ASPFiles.html. Accessed April 17, 2018.
38.
Bosschieter  J, Nieuwenhuijzen  JA, van Ginkel  T,  et al.  Value of an immediate intravesical instillation of mitomycin C in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a prospective multicenter randomized study in 2243 patients.  Eur Urol. 2018;73(2):226-232.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Rajala  P, Liukkonen  T, Raitanen  M,  et al.  Transurethral resection with perioperative instillation on interferon-alpha or epirubicin for the prophylaxis of recurrent primary superficial bladder cancer: a prospective randomized multicenter study—Finnbladder III.  J Urol. 1999;161(4):1133-1135.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
May 8, 2018

Effect of Intravesical Instillation of Gemcitabine vs Saline Immediately Following Resection of Suspected Low-Grade Non–Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer on Tumor Recurrence: SWOG S0337 Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
  • 2SWOG Statistical Center, Seattle, Washington
  • 3Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
  • 4Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
  • 5Oregon Health & Science University, Portland
  • 6Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
  • 7University of California Davis, Sacramento
  • 8University of Texas–San Antonio, San Antonio
  • 9University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • 10University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City
  • 11Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington
  • 12Urology Center of Colorado, Denver
  • 13University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City
  • 14University of Colorado, Aurora
  • 15Comprehensive Cancer Centers of Nevada, Las Vegas
  • 16CHRISTUS Santa Rosa Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
JAMA. 2018;319(18):1880-1888. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.4657
Key Points

Question  Does a single intravesical instillation of gemcitabine reduce risk of recurrence after resection of low-grade non–muscle-invasive urothelial cancer?

Finding  In this randomized clinical trial of 406 patients with suspected low-grade non–muscle-invasive urothelial cancer, intravesical instillation of gemcitabine, compared with saline, significantly reduced the risk of recurrence over a median of 4.0 years (recurrence rate: gemcitabine, 35%; saline, 47%; hazard ratio, 0.66).

Meaning  Intravesical gemcitabine immediately following tumor excision reduced risk of recurrence in patients with suspected low-grade non–muscle-invasive urothelial cancer.

Abstract

Importance  Low-grade non–muscle-invasive urothelial cancer frequently recurs after excision by transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT).

Objective  To determine whether immediate post-TURBT intravesical instillation of gemcitabine reduces recurrence of suspected low-grade non–muscle-invasive urothelial cancer compared with saline.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Randomized double-blind clinical trial conducted at 23 US centers. Patients with suspected low-grade non–muscle-invasive urothelial cancer based on cystoscopic appearance without any high-grade or without more than 2 low-grade urothelial cancer episodes within 18 months before index TURBT were enrolled between January 23, 2008, and August 14, 2012, and followed up every 3 months with cystoscopy and cytology for 2 years and then semiannually for 2 years. Patients were monitored for tumor recurrence, progression to muscle invasion, survival, and toxic effects. The final date of follow-up was August 14, 2016.

Interventions  Participants were randomly assigned to receive intravesical instillation of gemcitabine (2 g in 100 mL of saline) (n = 201) or saline (100 mL) (n = 205) for 1 hour immediately following TURBT.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was time to recurrence of cancer. Secondary end points were time to muscle invasion and death due to any cause.

Results  Among 406 randomized eligible patients (median age, 66 years; 84.7% men), 383 completed the trial. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 67 of 201 patients (4-year estimate, 35%) in the gemcitabine group and 91 of 205 patients (4-year estimate, 47%) in the saline group had cancer recurrence within 4.0 years (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90; P<.001 by 1-sided log-rank test for time to recurrence). Among the 215 patients with low-grade non–muscle-invasive urothelial cancer who underwent TURBT and drug instillation, 34 of 102 patients (4-year estimate, 34%) in the gemcitabine group and 59 of 113 patients (4-year estimate, 54%) in the saline group had cancer recurrence (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.35-0.81; P = .001 by 1-sided log-rank test for time to recurrence). Fifteen patients had tumors that progressed to muscle invasion (5 in the gemcitabine group and 10 in the saline group; P = .22 by 1-sided log-rank test) and 42 died of any cause (17 in the gemcitabine group and 25 in the saline group; P = .12 by 1-sided log-rank test). There were no grade 4 or 5 adverse events and no significant differences in adverse events of grade 3 or lower.

Conclusions and Relevance  Among patients with suspected low-grade non–muscle-invasive urothelial cancer, immediate postresection intravesical instillation of gemcitabine, compared with instillation of saline, significantly reduced the risk of recurrence over a median of 4.0 years. These findings support using this therapy, but further research is needed to compare gemcitabine with other intravesical agents.

Trial Registration  clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00445601

×