This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Here is a strange work in the field of human physiology— an admixture of freudianism, physiology, poetry, dithyrambic and erotic imaginings, sexual exultations and what not. The author has set forth his philosophy of the sexual life, which pictures woman as a parasite made neverthless for the sexual relief of man. Presumably the author has read some of Freud since his views reveal freudian inclinations; presumably he has read Havelock Ellis since he seems to aim at the lyric qualities of the Ellis prose. The result is a caricature of scientific writing, an object of curiosity in the field of literature, much as a perpetual priapism might be interesting but nevertheless pathologic and after a while tiresome.
The Physiology of Love. JAMA. 1929;93(7):567. doi:10.1001/jama.1929.02710070065030
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: