In Reply We agree with Dr Sonis that ORs have one distinct advantage over RRs when reporting the association between a binary outcome and a risk factor. If the original OR was computed for the occurrence of an outcome, then the OR for the nonoccurrence of the outcome is the inverse of the original OR. There is no such convenient transformation for RRs. He illustrates this point with a simple example and explains that this is important because for many outcomes it is arbitrary whether to report the outcome as the event occurrence or nonoccurrence.
Norton EC, Dowd BE, Maciejewski ML. Odds Ratios vs Risk Ratios—Reply. JAMA. 2018;320(19):2041–2042. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.14421
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: