To the Editor Dr Goligher and colleagues1 used a Bayesian approach to reanalyze the negative ECMO [extracorporeal membrane oxygenation] to Rescue Lung Injury in Severe ARDS [acute respiratory distress syndrome] (EOLIA) trial. I believe this reanalysis is an example of confirmation bias2 and illustrates the common criticisms of Bayesian methodology.
Aberegg SK. Post Hoc Bayesian Analyses. JAMA. 2019;321(16):1631–1632. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.1198
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: