[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.172.217.40. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 620
Citations 0
Comment & Response
November 12, 2019

Historical Practice of Separating Twins at Birth—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Pacella Research Center, New York Psychoanalytic Society and Institute, New York
  • 2Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey
JAMA. 2019;322(18):1827-1828. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.14408

In Reply We agree with Mr Kelmenson and Dr Wilets that evaluating the ethics of Neubauer’s twin’s study involves many complex factors. As we stressed in our article, the complex ethical issues provide valuable lessons for the present and the future.1

We question several of the authors’ comments. They state that our article maintained that separation of twins to be adopted was “characteristic of the era’s thinking.” In fact, we stated that a significant number of professionals and foster parents believed that it would be better for twins to be separated. In other words, this was a “line of thinking among child development specialists.” We did not intend to imply that all professionals subcribed to that perspective.

×