The remarkable decline in mortality from cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the United States since the 1960s has been attributed to a combination of primary prevention measures (smoking cessation, healthful diet, increased exercise), management of elevated blood pressure and lipids, and treatment of CVD when it occurs (revascularization, heart failure drugs). But since 2016, CVD death rates have leveled off and may even be rising slightly, prompting consideration of the next phase of how to address CVD. Currently, prevention options are to advocate broadly for primary prevention and to test for conventional risk factors and assign an estimated risk as the basis for treatment (secondary prevention).
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Joyner MJ, Paneth N. Cardiovascular Disease Prevention at a Crossroads: Precision Medicine or Polypill? JAMA. 2019;322(23):2281–2282. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.19026
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: