[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
January 23, 2020

Improving the Residency Application and Selection Process: An Optional Early Result Acceptance Program

Author Affiliations
  • 1University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor
  • 2American Medical Association, Chicago, Illinois
JAMA. 2020;323(6):503-504. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.21212
Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    Improving the Residency Application and Selection Process
    Robert Blacklow, AB, MD, D.Sci (hc) | Harvard Medical School
    I am responding as a past member of the NRMP Board of Directors (1993-2013), its President for two terms, and Treasurer for one. During my terms on the Board, we made several changes which improved the process: streamlined the couples match; changed the algorithm from a hospital match to a student match with the help of Alan Roth, a subsequent Nobel Prize winner; developed better processes for advanced specialty matches; and instituted a "second match" for those unmatched. The dual problems of excessive applications by medical students and the burdens it placed on the hospital programs were often discussed, many ideas were floated, but no acceptable solutions were found. These problems have continued and according to this article, have become even more burdensome.

    But the solution proposed here is not only unworkable and will create many more problems than it proposes to solve, but it is actually a step backwards to the time that there was no matching program. It proposes now an extra "early acceptance" match, similar to that at many undergraduate colleges. This will now create two cohorts of students in their last year of medical school: those who got in early, and those who did not. An already frenetic fourth year will be even more so, and reliance on grades, scores on required exams even more important and for the elite programs, "the rich will get even richer". Their burdens will greatly decrease--after all, half of their slots will already be filled.

    What is another option? Residency programs can become more transparent, listing their general requirements and the general characteristics, score levels and competencies of the last 3-5 cohorts they have accepted. This will help guide students and their faculty advisors in the selection process. But the Programs do not want to display their closely guarded secrets lest their competitors find out. Look closely: the fault lies not in our stars but in ourselves.