Equitable reimbursement for clinicians, health care facilities, and health plans who serve Medicare beneficiaries with widely varying health risks and medical needs is crucial. In traditional (fee-for-service) Medicare, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) increasingly pays via value-based payment (VBP) programs, in which payment is tied to performance based on quality and cost measures. In the Medicare Advantage program, which now serves more than one-third of Medicare beneficiaries, private managed care plans are paid capitated premiums based on each member’s risk profile. Because clinical outcomes and medical spending not only depend on the care that beneficiaries receive, but also on their underlying risk profile, accurate risk adjustment is essential to fairly judge clinicians and facilities in Medicare VBP programs and to fairly pay health plans in Medicare Advantage.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Johnston KJ, Bynum JPW, Joynt Maddox KE. The Need to Incorporate Additional Patient Information Into Risk Adjustment for Medicare Beneficiaries. JAMA. 2020;323(10):925–926. doi:10.1001/jama.2019.22370
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: