The 2016 review1 for the US Preventive Services Task Force on statins for prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults had errors in the analysis of statins vs placebo and cardiovascular mortality. For the JUPITER trial, we interpreted “MI, stroke or cardiovascular death” as reported in the main trial publication2 as “myocardial death, stroke death, or cardiovascular death,” when it meant “nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death.” Therefore, the analysis erroneously included nonfatal myocardial infarction and stroke events (83/8901 vs 157/8901 in the rosuvastatin vs placebo groups, respectively) in the analysis of cardiovascular mortality (Figure 3, panel B in the evidence review). The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review of atorvastatin reported 29 vs 37 cardiovascular mortality events in the rosuvastatin vs placebo groups, respectively, in JUPITER.3 However, a subsequent publication from 2 of the original JUPITER authors4 reported numbers of confirmed cardiovascular deaths of 35 vs 43 (not including 16 vs 25 cases of sudden death) in the rosuvastatin vs placebo groups. For the ASTRONOMER trial, data for cardiovascular deaths were transposed from another trial (2/103 vs 12/79 for statins vs placebo); the correct data are 2/134 vs 5/135.5
Chou R. Error in USPSTF Report on Statin Use. JAMA. 2020;323(7):669. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.0298
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: