Artist drawing of a male (left) and female (right) using the body scanner–derived proportion with a redrawn Leonardo da Vinci Vitruvian Man (center) using the same squares and circles. Some artistic license was applied to generate drawings in realistic poses; however, the proportions of the drawing were checked to ensure they agreed with the proportions obtained from our analysis.
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Thomas DM, Galbreath D, Boucher M, Watts K. Revisiting Leonardo da Vinci’s Vitruvian Man Using Contemporary Measurements. JAMA. 2020;323(22):2342–2343. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.3501
Five hundred years ago, Leonardo da Vinci attempted to memorialize Vitruvius’ description of man’s ideal human body. To do this, he manually measured proportions and combined them,1,2 creating one of the most famous drawings of the human body in the world—Vitruvian Man.3-5 Today, precise anthropometric body lengths can be obtained rapidly on large numbers of individuals. We repeated his approach using contemporary body scanning measurements to determine what Vitruvius’ proportions would be in this modern data set and how they would appear if drawn in the style of Vitruvian Man. We also extended the process to women.
Air Force training recruits, typically between the ages of 17 and 21 years, were scanned with the 3-dimensional body scanner (Vitus Smart XXL; Human Solutions) for the purpose of uniform sizing between February 2011 and November 2016 at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio, Texas. This study was reviewed and approved by the Human Protection Administrator of the US Military Academy. Because of a nonresearch determination, a waiver of consent was granted.
Seven proportions that Leonardo da Vinci identified were available in the body scanner measurements (Table). The same mean proportions and standard deviations were calculated using the body scanner measurements.
All statistical analyses were performed in the statistical program R (R Foundation; 2013).
The scanner-estimated proportions were then applied to draw male and female figures using the same design as Vitruvian Man.
The database of body scanner measurements consisted of 63 623 men and 1385 women. Mean male height was 175.1 cm (SD, 6.8 cm) and female height, 163.7 cm (SD, 6.6 cm).
The derived proportions for head height, arm span, breast to crown, and knee height were slightly more than Leonardo da Vinci’s estimates (Table). The remaining estimates (groin height, shoulder width, and thigh length) were slightly less. Except for arm span and thigh length, the differences in proportions for men measured by the body scanner and Vitruvian Man were within 10%. The difference in arm span was 20% and difference in thigh height was 29% more than Vitruvian Man.
Both male and female drawings (Figure) based on the body scanner data depict arms that reach outside of the square and circle from Leonardo da Vinci’s drawing, while the center of the circle and square are no longer exactly the navel or the groin.
Using proportions from a large modern database of automatically scanned anthropometric measurements in both men and women, a contemporary Vitruvian man (and woman) were created, and close agreement with Vitruvian Man was found. All contemporary proportions in men were within 10% of Vitruvian Man except for arm span and thigh length.
Limitations of the study include that a heterogeneous sample of young Air Force recruits was used to estimate the proportions. The sample likely differs from the Tuscan men measured by Leonardo da Vinci, although the exact number and age of individuals he measured is not known. Leonardo da Vinci’s notes and conclusions did not distinguish whether his insights were derived from a single individual or were aggregated.1,2 Also, Vitruvian Man merged the concept of a perfectly proportioned man5 with observed measurements and was not a representation of an average man. In fact, he could not rely on formal notions of population means and variability that were developed only over the last few centuries.6 His notes also did not include measurement precision, and his numerical observations were most likely rounded to the nearest integer. Additionally, the scanner lengths are determined from body reference points, which may differ from his reference points. Despite the different samples and methods of calculation, Leonardo da Vinci’s ideal human body and the proportions obtained with contemporary measurements were similar.
Accepted for Publication: March 2, 2020.
Corresponding Author: Diana M. Thomas, PhD, Department of Mathematical Sciences, Thayer Hall, US Military Academy, West Point, NY 10996 (email@example.com).
Author Contributions: Drs Thomas and Watts had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Thomas, Galbreath, Watts.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Thomas, Galbreath, Watts.
Statistical analysis: Thomas, Galbreath, Watts.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Boucher.
Supervision: Thomas, Watts.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Additional Contributions: We thank Kirsten Cooper, MA, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Robin Gauthe, BGS (self-employed), for editorial suggestions. No compensation was received.
Create a personal account or sign in to: