[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 8,807
Citations 0
JAMA Guide to Statistics and Methods
September 28, 2020

Worst-Rank Score Methods—A Nonparametric Approach to Informatively Missing Data

Author Affiliations
  • 1Biostatistics Center, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute School of Public Health, The George Washington University, Rockville, Maryland
JAMA. 2020;324(16):1670-1671. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.7709

A previous JAMA Guide to Statistics and Methods article1 briefly reviewed nonparametric statistics. Such statistical approaches represent the data using ranks of values rather than the observed values. This provides valid tests of significance, regardless of the underlying distributions of the values and without the need to posit parametric assumptions—thus the term “nonparametric statistics.” In the May 26, 2020, issue of JAMA, Baxter and colleagues from the N-TA3CT Research Group2 used a nonparametric analysis known as the worst-rank score method in a manner that also captured information from missing data that could result from worsening of the patient's condition.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×