[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Original Investigation
June 3, 2022

Association of Bariatric Surgery With Cancer Risk and Mortality in Adults With Obesity

Author Affiliations
  • 1Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 2Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 3Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Department of General Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston
  • 4Department of Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus
  • 5Metamor Institute, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
  • 6Cancer Metabolism Program, Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
  • 7Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 8Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
  • 9Cleveland Clinic Coordinating Center for Clinical Research, Cleveland, Ohio
JAMA. 2022;327(24):2423-2433. doi:10.1001/jama.2022.9009
Key Points

Question  Is there an association between bariatric surgery and the incidence of obesity-associated cancer and cancer-related mortality in patients with obesity?

Findings  In this retrospective cohort study of 30 318 patients (including 5053 patients who underwent bariatric surgery and 25 265 matched patients in the nonsurgical control group), bariatric surgery was significantly associated with a lower risk of obesity-associated cancer (hazard ratio, 0.68) and cancer-related mortality (hazard ratio, 0.52).

Meaning  Among adults with obesity, bariatric surgery compared with no surgery was associated with a significantly lower incidence of obesity-associated cancer and cancer-related mortality.

Abstract

Importance  Obesity increases the incidence and mortality from some types of cancer, but it remains uncertain whether intentional weight loss can decrease this risk.

Objective  To investigate whether bariatric surgery is associated with lower cancer risk and mortality in patients with obesity.

Design, Setting, and Participants  In the SPLENDID (Surgical Procedures and Long-term Effectiveness in Neoplastic Disease Incidence and Death) matched cohort study, adult patients with a body mass index of 35 or greater who underwent bariatric surgery at a US health system between 2004 and 2017 were included. Patients who underwent bariatric surgery were matched 1:5 to patients who did not undergo surgery for their obesity, resulting in a total of 30 318 patients. Follow-up ended in February 2021.

Exposures  Bariatric surgery (n = 5053), including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy, vs nonsurgical care (n = 25 265).

Main Outcomes and Measures  Multivariable Cox regression analysis estimated time to incident obesity-associated cancer (a composite of 13 cancer types as the primary end point) and cancer-related mortality.

Results  The study included 30 318 patients (median age, 46 years; median body mass index, 45; 77% female; and 73% White) with a median follow-up of 6.1 years (IQR, 3.8-8.9 years). The mean between-group difference in body weight at 10 years was 24.8 kg (95% CI, 24.6-25.1 kg) or a 19.2% (95% CI, 19.1%-19.4%) greater weight loss in the bariatric surgery group. During follow-up, 96 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 780 patients in the nonsurgical control group had an incident obesity-associated cancer (incidence rate of 3.0 events vs 4.6 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years). The cumulative incidence of the primary end point at 10 years was 2.9% (95% CI, 2.2%-3.6%) in the bariatric surgery group and 4.9% (95% CI, 4.5%-5.3%) in the nonsurgical control group (absolute risk difference, 2.0% [95% CI, 1.2%-2.7%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.53-0.87], P = .002). Cancer-related mortality occurred in 21 patients in the bariatric surgery group and 205 patients in the nonsurgical control group (incidence rate of 0.6 events vs 1.2 events, respectively, per 1000 person-years). The cumulative incidence of cancer-related mortality at 10 years was 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.2%) in the bariatric surgery group and 1.4% (95% CI, 1.1%-1.6%) in the nonsurgical control group (absolute risk difference, 0.6% [95% CI, 0.1%-1.0%]; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.31-0.88], P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance  Among adults with obesity, bariatric surgery compared with no surgery was associated with a significantly lower incidence of obesity-associated cancer and cancer-related mortality.

Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    Primary Prevention of Obesity
    Harry Wetzler, MD, MSPH | Independent Analyst
    Aminian and colleagues state "Bariatric surgery is the most effective currently available treatment for obesity." However, their study population had a median body mass index (BMI) greater than 45. Less invasive interventions among those with moderate obesity need to be considered. In a study with mean baseline BMI=31.5, Liu et al reported that over 60% of study participants had sustained weight loss equal to or greater than 5% after 12 months of daily calorie restriction (DCR) (1). Many experts consider 5% weight loss to be clinically significant (2).

    Although significant weight loss is possible with DCR, long-term maintenance is
    much more challenging (3). Yet recently, Rinott and colleagues reported diet-induced weight loss maintenance using diet-modulated autologous fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) (4,5). Since many people will find FMT repugnant if not distasteful, I suggest more emphasis be placed on primary prevention of obesity.

    References

    1. Liu D, Huang Y, Huang C, et al. Calorie Restriction with or without Time-Restricted Eating in Weight Loss. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(16):1495-1504.
    2. Horn DB, Almandoz JP, Look M. What is clinically relevant weight loss for your patients and how can it be achieved? A narrative review. Postgrad Med. 2022;1-17.
    3. Hall KD, Kahan S, Diseases K. Maintenance of lost weight. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102(1):183-197.
    4. Rinott E, Youngster I, Yaskolka Meir A, et al. Effects of Diet-Modulated Autologous Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Weight Regain. Gastroenterology. 2021;160(1):158-173.
    5. Nieuwdorp M, Madsen K. The Promise of Maintaining Diet-Induced Weight Loss by Swallowing One’s Own Feces: Time to Provide a Do-It-Yourself Manual? Gastroenterology. 2021;160(1):17-19.

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    ×