[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Other Articles
December 4, 1937


Author Affiliations


JAMA. 1937;109(23):1926. doi:10.1001/jama.1937.02780490064029

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  In a recent article (Shipley, A. M.: Pericarditis, The Journal, September 25, p. 1017) the author states that "in late cases with a large effusion, anterior drainage may not be effective" and that Truesdale, Heuer, Loucks, Moore and I have reported a "posterolateral approach, as far as the pericardium is concerned, by resection of the seventh rib near the midaxillary line."It is true that I discussed this approach in a paper read before the Western Surgical Association Dec. 9, 1932, but only to condemn it. I said that in the largest type of effusions the fluid could be readily reached in this manner but that the prompt expansion of the lung would quickly obstruct the drainage, while in the smaller effusions such drainage could not be effected without going directly through lung tissue (Suppurative Pericarditis: Description of a Case in Which Drainage Was Made Through a

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview