[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In

Featured Clinical Reviews

Original Investigation
Caring for the Critically Ill Patient
October 14, 2023

Cefepime vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults Hospitalized With Acute Infection: The ACORN Randomized Clinical Trial

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 2Department of Bioinformatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 3Division of General Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 4Department of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 5Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 6Department of Pharmaceutical Services, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 7Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 8Division of Infectious Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 9Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 10Division of Acute Care Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
  • 11Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville
JAMA. 2023;330(16):1557-1567. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.20583
Visual Abstract. Trial of Cefepime vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults Hospitalized With Acute Infection
Trial of Cefepime vs Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Adults Hospitalized With Acute Infection
Key Points

Question  Does the choice between cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam affect the risks of acute kidney injury or neurological dysfunction in adults hospitalized with acute infection?

Findings  Among 2511 adults hospitalized with acute infection, the highest stage of acute kidney injury or death was not significantly different between patients randomized to cefepime and those randomized to piperacillin-tazobactam. Patients randomized to cefepime experienced more neurological dysfunction, a secondary outcome.

Meaning  Among hospitalized adults, the risk of acute kidney injury did not differ between cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam, but neurological dysfunction was more common with cefepime.

Abstract

Importance  Cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam are commonly administered to hospitalized adults for empirical treatment of infection. Although piperacillin-tazobactam has been hypothesized to cause acute kidney injury and cefepime has been hypothesized to cause neurological dysfunction, their comparative safety has not been evaluated in a randomized clinical trial.

Objective  To determine whether the choice between cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam affects the risks of acute kidney injury or neurological dysfunction.

Design, Setting, and Participants  The Antibiotic Choice on Renal Outcomes (ACORN) randomized clinical trial compared cefepime vs piperacillin-tazobactam in adults for whom a clinician initiated an order for antipseudomonal antibiotics within 12 hours of presentation to the hospital in the emergency department or medical intensive care unit at an academic medical center in the US between November 10, 2021, and October 7, 2022. The final date of follow-up was November 4, 2022.

Interventions  Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to cefepime or piperacillin-tazobactam.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was the highest stage of acute kidney injury or death by day 14, measured on a 5-level ordinal scale ranging from no acute kidney injury to death. The 2 secondary outcomes were the incidence of major adverse kidney events at day 14 and the number of days alive and free of delirium and coma within 14 days.

Results  There were 2511 patients included in the primary analysis (median age, 58 years [IQR, 43-69 years]; 42.7% were female; 16.3% were Non-Hispanic Black; 5.4% were Hispanic; 94.7% were enrolled in the emergency department; and 77.2% were receiving vancomycin at enrollment). The highest stage of acute kidney injury or death was not significantly different between the cefepime group and the piperacillin-tazobactam group; there were 85 patients (n = 1214; 7.0%) in the cefepime group with stage 3 acute kidney injury and 92 (7.6%) who died vs 97 patients (n = 1297; 7.5%) in the piperacillin-tazobactam group with stage 3 acute kidney injury and 78 (6.0%) who died (odds ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.80 to 1.13], P = .56). The incidence of major adverse kidney events at day 14 did not differ between groups (124 patients [10.2%] in the cefepime group vs 114 patients [8.8%] in the piperacillin-tazobactam group; absolute difference, 1.4% [95% CI, −1.0% to 3.8%]). Patients in the cefepime group experienced fewer days alive and free of delirium and coma within 14 days (mean [SD], 11.9 [4.6] days vs 12.2 [4.3] days in the piperacillin-tazobactam group; odds ratio, 0.79 [95% CI, 0.65 to 0.95]).

Conclusions and Relevance  Among hospitalized adults in this randomized clinical trial, treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam did not increase the incidence of acute kidney injury or death. Treatment with cefepime resulted in more neurological dysfunction.

Trial Registration  ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05094154

Add or change institution
×