[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
January 17, 1948


JAMA. 1948;136(3):176-177. doi:10.1001/jama.1948.02890200030008

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


The pride of medicine as a profession has always been its freedom from the taint of barter and trade in the sick patient. Physicians must give their wholehearted devotion to the care of the patient; no other objective must be given precedence over considerations of the patient's need. Nevertheless, the charge is made that some physicians have forgotten the ethical principles that prevail in the relationship between doctor and patient and have selected the surgeon willing to make the greatest division of fees rather than the one best suited to perform the operation. Ophthalmologists have sent the patient for lenses to opticians who returned a proportion of the fee rather than to the optician who rendered the highest quality of optical service. Occasionally orthopedic surgeons and others who utilize the work of the maker of braces, splints and elastic bandages have been willing to accept commissions from such manufacturers and

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview