[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 34.226.244.70. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Other Articles
June 2, 1951

MULTIPHASIC SCREENING

Author Affiliations

Professor of Industrial Hygiene, Columbia University School of Public Health, New York 32.

JAMA. 1951;146(5):495. doi:10.1001/jama.1951.03670050077026

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —I feel reasonably certain that Dr. Wilson G. Smillie would be greatly disappointed if nobody were to take issue with some of the thoughts expressed in his provocative article in the April 21, 1951, issue of The Journal. In my opinion, Dr. Smillie does an excellent job of presenting the pro's and con's of multiphasic screening, but the conclusions he reaches do not seem to follow logically from the premises he establishes. Any procedure which is relatively inexpensive and which will bring to light "27 to 47 cases of previously undetected serious pathological conditions" in every 1,000 persons examined, and a considerably larger number of less serious abnormalities, can hardly be characterized as "unsound in its concepts, untenable in its principles and indefensible in its logic."If, as Dr. Smillie asserts, it is "a complete wastage of time and effort" to include chest x-ray examinations of school

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×