This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor:—
In the lead article in The Journal, Feb. 16, an otolaryngologist resurrects a controversy regarded by many authorities as settled. Among the listed indications for tonsillectomy is one to eliminate "focal infection: metastatic, toxic, or allergic." This advice, if heeded, may undo much of the good brought about by general rejection of a theory once widely accepted. There is no proof that tonsillectomy cures or prevents a variety of systemic diseases. Furthermore, how does one decide whether a tonsil is chronically infected? The statement that tonsillectomy "can transform a puny, listless patient into a happy vigorous child" is reminiscent of one made by another otolaryngologist to the effect that universal tonsillectomy in childhood would improve the human race. Still another one envisioned a laryngologist's dream of an orchard of tonsil-bearing trees.The author failed to mention publications opposed to the concept (Fry, J.: Are All "T's and
Reimann HA. TONSILS AND FOCAL INFECTION. JAMA. 1957;163(13):1179. doi:10.1001/jama.1957.02970480083023
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.