[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Other Articles
June 17, 1961

ON WHOSE SIDE ARE SIDE-EFFECTS?

Author Affiliations

New York City

JAMA. 1961;176(11):945-946. doi:10.1001/jama.1961.03040240051019

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

With increasing frequency in my current reading, especially on drugs and their application, I encounter the term side-effects; sometimes as the heading of a section in papers in which there is no further discussion of other undesirable effects, sometimes as a subheading under toxic effects, most often in simple summary statements such as, "Toxic effects were rare; side-effects were common."

Side-effects seem to cause more anguish to me than to their victims or to the authors of papers I read, yet I do not believe I am unduly sensitive. I am disturbed because I am not certain what the term really means in each case. Side-effects seem so innocent that in most papers there is a tendency to do nothing about them beyond counting. Sometimes "undesirable" side-effects are enumerated as if to imply that there might also be some "desirable" side-effects. But then I also read about "serious side-effects." Occasionally

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×