THE FOLLOWING CASE is presented for three reasons. First, the wound of dental extraction is a relatively rare and usually unconsidered portal of entry for the tetanus organism. Graves in 1930 reported three cases of tetanus after dental extraction.1 Three years later Appleton was able to find only three additional cases reported in the literature and attributed the infection to inadequate sterilization of dental instruments.2 Griswold and Herring in 1949 described a patient with tetanus following dental extraction who was initially thought to be hysterical.3 Shershin and Katz in 1964 reported an additional case and gave references to two other case reports in the world literature.4
Second, the symptoms of the patient's tetanus infection accurately mimicked in exaggerated form symptoms which had long been present on presumably a psychophysiologic basis. Thus, diagnosis of tetanus was delayed.
Third, as part of a survey project the patient's ankle
Treadway CR, Prange AJ. Tetanus Mimicking Psychophysiologic Reaction: Occurrence After Dental Extraction. JAMA. 1967;200(10):891–892. doi:10.1001/jama.1967.03120230143030
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: