This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
To the Editor.—
Dr Jukes' reply to my correspondence (234:806, 1975) is precisely the type of "discussion" to which I took exception and that should have no place in science.Dr Jukes states in his letter that he did not "link Pauling's name with that of J. I. Rodale; I [Jukes] quoted both of them as theorizing that massive doses of vitamins penetrate physiological barriers." Here is what Jukes wrote in his article (233:550, 1975): "Megavitamin therapy is advocated in the writings of Linus Pauling and the late J. I. Rodale." This is "guilt by association." Rodale was no scientist and Dr Jukes knows it.Dr Jukes said in his letter: "I quoted both of them as theorizing that massive doses of vitamins penetrate physiological barriers." This also differed from what he wrote in his article, to wit, that Pauling's theory of "orthomolecular psychiatry [is] a concept not unlike Rodale's
Sackler AM. Megavitamin Therapy. JAMA. 1976;235(6):598–599. doi:10.1001/jama.1976.03260320016008
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: