I appreciate the kind comments by Dr Steier concerning our publication "Neonatal and Pediatric Cardiovascular Crisis." However, I cannot agree with his statement that Steinfeld et al have proved the "nonexistence of the so-called wide cuff effect." I personally have responded to a "stat page" for a child who was thought to be in shock and found that the only problem was a change in nursing personnel; the new nurse used a cuff that was too large. Also, from a theoretical point of view, physical damping will reduce energy transmitted through the system, and an excessively long cuff reduces the amplitude of transmitted waves and will, accordingly, reduce the apparent systolic blood pressure.As Steinfeld and his colleagues admit, they used a Doppler ultrasonic transducer for a pickup and suggested that poor signal pickup with a stethoscope could account for the low values previously reported with the application
Guntheroth WG. Neonatal and Pediatric Cardiovascular Crisis-Reply. JAMA. 1976;235(11):1105–1106. doi:10.1001/jama.1976.03260370015006
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: