ANOTHER chapter is being written in the melancholy history of cancer quackery. This chapter, entitled "Laetrile," follows the outline of its predecessors. First, a remedy is introduced resulting from a novel "strange idea." Next, its promoters become so dedicated to advocating the remedy that they cannot retreat from a position which becomes untenable as a result of exposure of the worthlessness of the remedy. Third, the promoters are reinforced in their fraudulence by champions of the "underdog" against the "establishment," and by the surviving relatives of the deceased victims of cancer. These relatives, because of feelings of guilt, cling to their belief that treatment with the "remedy" was the best possible therapy. Finally, vast sums of money and amounts of time are wasted on elaborate tests of the "remedy" by qualified scientists who should be doing something useful. These tests are usually undertaken because of coercion by legislators and other
Jukes TH. Laetrile for Cancer. JAMA. 1976;236(11):1284–1286. doi:10.1001/jama.1976.03270120056033
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: