This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
When Third World nations changed their designation from "underdeveloped" to "developing," they made it clear that there are nuances in the meaning of "development." In a different context, "developing" is proving to be a problem word in medical communications.
Every medical editor is familiar with "the patient developed...," an expression that all too frequently recurs in case reports. Be it a symptom, a syndrome, or a sickness, the patient never tires of "developing" it—and the editor never tires of blue-penciling the transitive "developed." The patient, our stylebooks tell us, may develop an idea, a theme, a project, a skill—anything in which he is an active participant—but he cannot develop a sickness, a syndrome, a symptom, or any other process independent of his volition.
Reluctant to seek substitutes for "developed," the editor frequently attempts to retain it by inverting the sentence so as to have the symptom, syndrome, or sickness "develop"
Vaisrub S. Who or What Developed? JAMA. 1976;236(23):2657. doi:10.1001/jama.1976.03270240053032
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: