[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
December 27, 1976

Incorrectly Cited References

JAMA. 1976;236(26):2944. doi:10.1001/jama.1976.03270270006020

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


In the Original Contribution, "Clinical Experience With Theophylline," published in the May 3 issue (235:1983-1986,1976), two references were incorrectly cited. On page 1986, column 1 line 2, the 10 μg/ml value is supported by reference 4 (not 5), and five lines down, the value 4 to 5 μg/ml is supported by references 5 and 9 (not 6 and 9). This clarifies the objections of Dr Nicholson in his Letter to the Editor on this subject published in the Aug 30 issue (236:1010, 1976).