This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
In the current issue of the Archives of General Psychiatry (30:129-135, 1974) Romano writes on the always elusive concept of informed consent in clinical research and again suggests the still unresolved ethical question: how informed is informed consent?
His research project deals with children at risk for schizophrenia and their parents, and while he does not list exactly what the project involves, he makes it clear that it does not include the risks of pharmacological liabilities (either in the administration or withholding of drugs) or surgical invasions, but rather such minimal risk procedures as observations, questions, and suggestions involving perhaps inconvenience and psychic discomfort, and the risks of invaded confidentiality, albeit in an appropriately protected context.
While Romano recognizes the vulnerability of confidential information in a research setting, including it under the notion of risk and seeking appropriate methods of getting informed consent, his main concern seems to be the
O'Donnell TJ. Informed Consent. JAMA. 1974;227(1):73. doi:10.1001/jama.1974.03230140043012
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: